fiber photometry analysis matlab software suite pmat Search Results


matlab 2019a  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc matlab 2019a
Matlab 2019a, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab 2019a/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab 2019a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab 2014a  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc matlab 2014a
Matlab 2014a, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab 2014a/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab 2014a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
2014a and 2017a  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc 2014a and 2017a
2014a And 2017a, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/2014a and 2017a/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
2014a and 2017a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab software  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc matlab software
Matlab Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
custom matlab script for fiber photometry analysis  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc custom matlab script for fiber photometry analysis
(A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber <t>photometry</t> experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.
Custom Matlab Script For Fiber Photometry Analysis, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/custom matlab script for fiber photometry analysis/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom matlab script for fiber photometry analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
software product lines  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc software product lines
(A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber <t>photometry</t> experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.
Software Product Lines, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/software product lines/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
software product lines - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
semiautomatic muscle fiber analysis software  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc semiautomatic muscle fiber analysis software
(A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber <t>photometry</t> experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.
Semiautomatic Muscle Fiber Analysis Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/semiautomatic muscle fiber analysis software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
semiautomatic muscle fiber analysis software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab r2018b  (Tucker-Davis Tech)
90
Tucker-Davis Tech matlab r2018b
(A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber <t>photometry</t> experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.
Matlab R2018b, supplied by Tucker-Davis Tech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab r2018b/product/Tucker-Davis Tech
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab r2018b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
custom code matlab r2018b  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc custom code matlab r2018b
(A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber <t>photometry</t> experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.
Custom Code Matlab R2018b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/custom code matlab r2018b/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom code matlab r2018b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fiber diameter matlab software  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc fiber diameter matlab software
(A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber <t>photometry</t> experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.
Fiber Diameter Matlab Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fiber diameter matlab software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fiber diameter matlab software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab 2016a  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc matlab 2016a
(A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber <t>photometry</t> experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.
Matlab 2016a, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab 2016a/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab 2016a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber photometry experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: Distinct subpopulations of ventral pallidal cholinergic projection neurons encode valence of olfactory stimuli

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114009

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Example heatmaps from the behavioral paradigms tested (from left to right): saline (SAL), appetitive odor (APP), aversive odor (AV). Insets illustrate the typical path traveled by mice under each condition. Left: presentation of SAL in both test arms results in approximately equal time spent in each arm. Middle: presentation of an APP odor in one arm elicits approach behavior. Right: presentation of an AV odor elicits avoidance behavior. (B) Left: total time spent in each arm under SAL vs. SAL conditions, compared with SAL vs. APP and SAL vs. AV conditions. (C) Behavioral responses measured as percent change of time spent in odor vs. SAL arm. (D) Left: representative image of activated cholinergic neurons in a coronal slice (Br 0.14) following odor preference test. Right: higher-magnification images of a representative area within the VP (top; scale bar, 200 μm), with additional magnification of the demarcated area in the inset shown below (scale bar, 50 μm). Blue, DAPI; green, cFos; magenta, ChAT. (E) Representative high-magnification images of the VP following ChAT and cFos immunohistochemistry. First column, SAL; second column, APP odor; third column, AV odor. Rows are representative images for ChAT (first row), cFos (second row), the overlay between ChAT and cFos (third row), and co-localization between ChAT and cFos (fourth row). Scale bars, 50 μm. Arrowheads represent co-localized ChAT and cFos neurons in the VP. (F) Total counts of neurons immunostained for both ChAT and cFos. (G) Co-localization of ChAT and cFos in the VP in total numbers (left) and percentage of ChAT + neurons that co-express cFos (right). (H) Workflow and timeline for in vivo fiber photometric assays. (I and J) VP FLEX-GCaMP6f traces in response to the first 10-s delivery of the APP odor (I) and AV odor (J). Shaded area represents the time window for odor delivery. (K and L) Area under the curve (AUC) measurements before, during, and following each APP odor (K) or AV odor (L) delivery. (M and N) Maximum Z -score Δ F/F before, during, and following APP odor (M) and AV odor (N) exposure. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, NS, not significant. Error bars represent mean ± SEM. For both behavior and IHC experiments (A–G), sample sizes are as follows: SAL, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females; APP odor, n = 9 mice, 4 males and 5 females; AV odor, n = 8 mice, 4 males and 4 females. For fiber photometry experiments, n = 7 mice, 5 males and 2 females.

Article Snippet: Custom MATLAB script for fiber photometry analysis , This paper , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10723901.

Techniques: Saline, Immunohistochemistry, In Vivo

KEY RESOURCES TABLE

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: Distinct subpopulations of ventral pallidal cholinergic projection neurons encode valence of olfactory stimuli

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114009

Figure Lengend Snippet: KEY RESOURCES TABLE

Article Snippet: Custom MATLAB script for fiber photometry analysis , This paper , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10723901.

Techniques: Virus, Plasmid Preparation, Recombinant, Software